RM 201 · ADMIN

Investment thesis

Distressed basis. Durable infrastructure. Multiple paths to value.

We seek opportunities where

  • The acquisition basis is a small fraction of replacement cost
  • The building and land have defensible underlying value
  • Early areas can be activated without completing the whole redevelopment
  • There are multiple potential uses rather than one binary thesis
  • Local public-sector alignment can reduce friction
  • Digital infrastructure creates additional demand and operating leverage
  • Long-term value can come from operations, redevelopment, land, leasing and/or disposition

What we avoid

  • Buildings that are cheap only because they are structurally failed
  • Uncontrolled environmental liabilities
  • Communities with punitive carrying costs
  • Title problems that cannot be resolved
  • Projects dependent on one speculative end use
  • Municipalities that are unresponsive or adversarial to reuse
  • Projects where full-building renovation is required before any revenue is possible

Portfolio approach

We intend to favor a small number of high-conviction projects rather than maximize property count. Our current operating target is approximately 10–20 projects over five years, subject to capital and underwriting.

Underwriting inputs we always compute

annual_tax ÷ acquisition_pricecarrying-cost sanity
annual_tax ÷ stabilized_NOIpost-activation viability
basis ÷ replacement costmargin of safety

This website describes a strategy and is not an offer to sell securities or a promise of investment returns.

Investor / strategic partner interest